Rousseau, Locke and Kant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Rousseau, Locke and Kant - Essay ExampleIf changing the human means changing the beliefs,possibly even the world prognosiss of people,Rousseau,Locke and Kant take a leak hanged the world.Certainly,unlike the case with Marx,their political philosophies did not inspire revolutions which changed nations,led to cold wars betwixt East and West or motivated the construction of the Berlin Wall. However, Locke, Rousseau and Kant changed our political perspectives, our understanding of the rights and duties of citizens and states and emphasized mans right and responsibility to take political action, even revolution, when needed. From a subjective perspective, at least, these three philosophers turn over changed the world. We live in a dynamic world, one which is constantly changing, with much of this change being political in nature. One of the primary engines of change is political philosophy. The work of the philosophers is to question, critique and redefine the world. Through their con tinue critical interpretation of the world, philosophers explain certain trends and phenomenon as, for example, Locke and Rousseau did in relation to the evolution of governments. However, their work is not exceptional to providing explanations save to exposing the conditions surrounding a phenomenon and its intended purposes versus its current function. Again, as an example, Rousseau outlined the conditions which motivated men to enrol into a social contract with governments, or a central authority. In doing so, they imposed a adjust of obligations upon governments, with the implication being that these governments do not only derive their legitimacy from the will of the masses however that they retain their legitimacy by fulfilling their obligation to the masses. By exposing such phenomenon and by making people bring in the difference between what was intended and what now is, versus what should be, philosophers are not only interpreting the world but they are inciting men t o change it. In almost instances, they do so by exposing the termination to which some things pass on deviated from their intended purposes and by justifying corrective action. In others, they incite change by highlighting the extent to which certain phenomenon, as in political systems, have oppressed men, are contrary to the natural tack together and by proposing alternatives.Political philosophy is interpretive and it may be argued that political philosophers have subjectively understand the world but, interpretations are directed towards the inciting of change and action. Marx may have had a different point of view and may have argued that philosophers have not fulfilled their purpose of changing the world and only understand it. However, from a personal point of view and on the basis of the political philosophers discussed and studied so outlying(prenominal) and discussions on the purpose of political philosophy, I am persuaded that the purpose is to change, not just inte rpret, and that many have successfully fulfilled this purpose. A brief review of the political philosophies of Locke, Rousseau and Kant shall argue this point of view.In his due south treatise of Government, Locke investigates the circumstances which incited men to undertake the creation of a central authority and the conditions which determined that this central authority, the government, is legitimate. In examining this question, Locke traces the emergence of political communities to the tribal and group structures which had earlier dominated. Illustrating that while these bands, due to size, may not have needed governments or a central authority and state institutions, the gradual growth of these tribes and their evolution into colonized communities, imposed this necessity. In piece to protect their interests, their life and property, community members entered into a social contract with a central authority, resigning part of their liberty to that central authority, in exchange for protection through law and order and, importantly, through policies and actions which benefit the interests of the majority.